In un altro articolo ho spiegato, sommariamente i metodi del delitto rituale, e molti dei punti elencati, se non tutti, rientrano in tutti gli omicidi sopra riportati ( arma che non si trova, un presunto colpevole che da certo diventa mano a mano sempre meno certo, modalità, nomi e personaggi che entrano in queste storie).
Allora perchè nessuno, in questa orda mediatica, si pone e pone delle domande ? Simply because the script does not have it. Because the image of the monster by the media (which is the mother, uncle or boyfriend) is, ironically, reassuring, it only happens in certain circles, the monster is taken over all, has a hypnotic fascination on the masses, all united against the monster, indignation takes over and completely obscured any critical sense (the death penalty was the watchword in the days following the murder of Avetrana, but the same thing was repeated with Grass and Cogne). People want a culprit at all costs, and once laid eyes on the likely everything else goes out the light, but my little question is well lit and some really easy I would let you (they are welcome if you have the answers ...) At
Misseri confesses and says he used a rope "It was a meter long ... fine line of those who get the chainsaw ... biggest of the string, gray ... well, where is the rope? "I've thrown in a box" ... no, a distance of days says "I burn" is gone ... ok but the coroner Street reassures everyone and says in his preliminary report to strangle the girl has been used a rope ... it all comes back, the confession is somewhat corroborated by the coroner Misseri ... except that at one point says, "It was not a rope, I was not I was Sabrina and used a belt "... and here begins to crack the theorem, investigators come to the rescue of the good doctor back road that says "Yes may have been used a belt." Bon ... and where is the belt? ... Oh, well ... make no mistake they kidnap 49 in a house and inside the machine Missseri, which obviously is not only not been searched, but which was not even opened the trunk in three-month attachment at the police. Moral of the story is not known, as Cogne, Garlasco, Perugia and grass not only what happened to the weapon but that weapon was actually used. Why?
We come to the particular symbolic of the story: Misseri said he abused his niece under a fig tree and the well marked where he had thrown a branch of lives. Now the vine and fig tree (which had no apparent reason to enter the confession) have clear symbolic value (representing the birth to new life) and the screw especially refers to the crimes of the monster (another story of a thousand unresolved because, if you can find the history in the archives of the blog) ... so the symbols already used for the ritual killings, which are those of the monster ... yet no one seems badarci, no one wonders why these details come out ... why not Bruno (criminologist who know well the facts of the monster) does not mention it in the thousands of appearances Vespiane? In return, October 16 says: "Sabrina was to design the murder." And Uncle Misseri Michele says: "There was no nulla di più..distonico che il rapporto sessuale con la nipote." La scena del delitto è ormai chiara,lo Zio Michele Misseri si è trovato difronte al delitto.La prossima clamorosa rivelazione potrebbe infatti essere quella della sua totale estraneità alla morte di Sarah.Michele Misseri e' forse intervenuto a cose fatte" non c'è che dire...sembra saperla lunga su tutto ma non sulla simbologia)....semplicemente perchè sono messaggi che devono arrivare a qualcuno...il rito si è compiuto secondo la forma.Guardate bene questa foto del cancello di casa Misseri
We see then the legal apparatus of this story: the strangeness of the appointment of Advocate Biscuits (legal Guede and family of Brenda) have already discussed, at some point in the story's lawyer Misseri. Galloppa, says: "Is there anyone who could put pressure on my client because I will be replaced" ... who? Misseri Perhaps because he was convinced to withdraw? Why the retraction was bothering someone in such cases the lawyer 's office merely to take the partial infirmity or mental illness ..
certainly do not go to board in the retraction a confession .. And why after this output Gallop joins another old acquaintance of the company's horror: the criminologist Roberta Bruzzone (already appeared on our screens during the grass where he assumed the presence of another person during the crime), while the 'Biscuits lawyer asks the help of the former General of RIS Garofalo (another familiar face from Cogne in ... it's always been present in every crime the media ... ... with poor results or good, depending on the point of view).
Another question: It is reported that afternoon in Sara's disappearance is a powerful cars start from the home of her friend says Misseri.Sabrina fact that the contact 10 minutes after they disappeared'' taken''!
Many people use this phrase as proof that she was involved in diverting the fact that this phrase means one thing very clear .. that a group of people took it and carried away ..
probably in that big car and she knew who they were. Why this car enters and leaves the story without anyone talk anymore?
Why, all still in the garage indicate the place of the murder, when, in fact, did not reveal any trace organic? ... Now you start talking to happened in the house .. maybe a bit 'like the string and the belt ... where she was killed? (Ritual murder moving the corpse is another classic)
trivial Other considerations: Misseri wife and two farmers, the villa where they live seems far beyond the economic possibilities of the farmer, from where the money? The GIP
said too quickly "that the reasons are not outside the family but intra-family, and the case is' closed to 90%." It 's not closed anything, too many things that do not add up.
The media coverage is absolutely incredible to think of a very powerful intervention to create a story in order to distract the masses from political events in the course
Conclusion: pedophilia, it remains to decide whether intra-family non-family member, clergy or state.
Before being savaged by the Catholic Church points out that it would never have crossed my mind but were not for the Catholic funeral (Sarah was not named ...) that is associated with the screw (a new lease of life) may give rise to some conjecture.
0 comments:
Post a Comment